Saturday, August 27, 2011

A Summer Within A Tale of Two Cities

Charles Dickens's notorious novel was the source of my excitement and despair this summer. It was not my first trial with the book, as I read a child edition when I was younger, but my first competent analysis of it. My past experience with the story was a significant reason why I decided to retrace those steps through the summer assignment. Moreover, I wanted to know the story better as the end was the only element I could recall and the love story was one I felt I ought to read, or re-read, at some point in my life.
                    A Tale of Two Cities being my first Dickens experience I have a narrow-minded opinion of his storytelling abilities. These opinions are mostly positive. The intricacy with which Dickens wove his characters was unexpected; the novel began with a seemingly distant set of characters that resultantly came together to affect each other in unanticipated ways. Dickens progression of each of these characters was so detail oriented he must have known the direction each would take and thus, intertwined these character strands to apply each character's actions to the others. An example being Madame Defarge, whose original nonchalance grew into dangerous and powerful deeds that would punish those her husband had once helped. Dickens also used the characters to carry the story from various perspectives, regardless of who or where they were, the story continued on the same timeline guided by his different characters in different situations.
                   His excellence in storytelling continues with his unexpected, satisfying conclusion. In the midst of perilous Paris the story's center characters, Lucy and Doctor Manette, came away safe and content, but only after the sacrifice of a near stranger. Carton's decision to impersonate Lucy's husband and die for their happiness remained a vague plan until the book's end. Carton's own emotions towards Lucy and his dire devotion only shown threw as the reader put the pieces of Carton's plan together. This happy-with-a-price ending is original to Dickens and an unanticipated result that although may leave the reader in tears, grants them satisfaction which every good story possesses.
                  Dickens's ideas behind the text are another element of the novel that flatter his storytelling abilities. The tale pushes the reader to think, specifically the conclusion. The reality that a friend could do as much as die for your happiness and love you more than their own comfort, unbeknownst to you, shakes the minds of all that put Dickens down. He has made me realize that their is no way to measure love or know it to be true through words or evident deeds, only actions--the secret and private ones--can measure what love is. Although love is a major topic within the story, Dickens offers other ideas behind his text, ideas such as human barbarianism, cruelty, and animal instinct. The novel comes to be Dickens's own statement on humanity: how the French Revolution, as an example, destroyed the human facade of civility to reveal the dark truth of beastliness that lies mere years of hardship under our surface. These ideas to ponder are provided throughout the novel and manifest Dickens's exemplary storytelling abilities.
                Dickens's Tale is an exemplary work of excellent storytelling due to his incorporation of detailed characters and plot, unanticipated and satisfactory conclusion, and the philosophical ideas that lay behind the text.

4 comments:

  1. I'm not sure that you really make clear in your first paragraph what aspects of Dickens' work you think best exemplify his talents, but you make that clear as the entry progresses. Most of the body of the essay is good, but I think there are some instances where your word usage is a bit odd--specific examples of which are notorious and narrow-minded, which have connotations that are perhaps more negative than what you're intending to evoke. Additionally, you might want to steer away from sweeping generalizations about such as the concluding sentence of the third paragraph where you mention "every good story"--a good story might equally make a reader feel profoundly uncomfortable about something rather than satisfying her. Aside from those minor issues, good entry!

    ReplyDelete
  2. This was a good first draft. You do have a lot of evidence, although I would include a couple more specific examples, or quotes. You have a clear thesis, but it only appears at the very end, so I would make sure to include it in your first paragraph. There are also a couple sentences you might want to revise and tighten up. Overall, I though it was very interesting, and you make some good points!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really like the personal story in the intro paragraph. It, like, sets your paper apart from all the other papers just talking about finding a story to read over the summer. That said, I think that you should maybe add a few more sentences to the intro paragraph giving a bit more detail about what your paper will be about. I also couldn't really find a distinct thesis yet.

    Aside from that, the organization of your paragraphs is well-done. Your intro-sentences (if that's what they're called) really lead into the material you cover in the paragraph, and I think the whole paper flows nicely. You make your points nicely and give good detail in your paper--I was able to understand what you were talking about even though I haven't read the book.

    On a lesser note, in your second paragraph, you have the phrase "Dickens progression," which if I'm reading correctly should be possessive. And in the fourth paragraph you have the phrase "their is no way." I think the proper form would be "there" in that case. But those are just simple things!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Zoe, Zoe, Zoe... always a pleasure reading your work. Your writing style never seems to lack any holes, gaps, or unpleasant language so let me commend you for that. You definitely naturally have the writer's "flow" or rather you have worked very hard to achieve it. I noticed you posted this piece at 2:42 p.m... I'm assuming a few of those rare grammar errors were due to your being rushed before school dismissed so I'm not too worried about that. A couple things I want to point out from the start... you definitely made clear in your first paragraph why you chose Dicken's novel, however, you failed to state why or why not the book was an example of good storytelling. A good thesis, representing the significance of the later points you make, could really serve as the backbone of a wonderful essay. Also, you clearly stated, "I have a narrow-minded opinion of his storytelling abilities. These opinions are mostly positive." If your going to use the word "mostly" there you have me, as the reader, anticipating one or more examples of how its not a fully positive experience. Are there some things about this book that aren't positive? ...If so, I'm curious as the reader to know what they are. Just be careful with that word "mostly." It could potentially lessen the strength of your argument. One more thing I would like to comment on... You listed other big picture ideas within the texts besides love, such as human barbarianism, cruelty, and animal instinct. Are you going to elaborate on these themes or are they just there to make a point? It very well might have been the short length of the assignment that held you back, but I was just curious as to what you would do with that. By the way the point you make about love is rather fascinating... Can love be measured? If it can, how so? I would like to read this book; that is a question I find myself pondering upon quite often. With that said, all of the topics and examples you brought up were very strong and intriguing. You had very good support for all of the points you committed to. This start right here, Zoe, has a lot of potential to be a great essay. I hope you stick to your main examples here and formulate a classic, well-developed, and solid "Zoe thesis" around them. Again Zoe, good work, keep it up.

    ReplyDelete